Testimony

testimony before state legislature
use TAGs to differentiate years

2020 Testimony – 30

I am Opposed to Bill #5448 AN ACT CONCERNING A RISK PROTECTION ORDER OR WARRANT Sen Winfield, Rep Stafstrom, Members of the Judiciary Committee, If this committee is concerned with legal gun owners’ mental health, why pass a bill that will discourage gun owners from seeking mental health? The current law has is effective. Oppose […]

2020 Testimony – 30 Read More »

2020 Testimony – 46

OPPOSE- Raised HB-5448 An Act Concerning a Risk Protection Order or Warrant Judiciary Committee, I’m opposed to any procedure that allows a judge to hear only one side of a case, this will produce a high error rate. Civil liberties will be striped based on one sided judgment. This wrong. Oppose Raised HB-5448. SUPPORT- Raised

2020 Testimony – 46 Read More »

2020 Testimony – 62

Oppose Bill #5448 An Act Concerning a Risk Protection Order or Warrant Members of the Joint Judiciary Committee Keep the due process, allow for an investigation before rights are taken away. Any procedure that allows a judge to hear only one side of a case necessarily will produce a high error rate. Support Bill #5432

2020 Testimony – 62 Read More »

2020 Testimony – 78

Joint Committee on Judiciary 300 Capitol Avenue Hartford, CT 06106 OPPOSTITION to HB 5448 AN ACT CONCERNING A RISK PROTECTION ORDER OR WARRANT SUPPORT for HB 5432 AN ACT CONCERNING NONLETHAL ELECTRONIC DEFENSE WEAPONS SUPPORT HB 5390 AN ACT CONCERNING THE DUTY TO RETREAT IN A HOUSE OF RELIGIOUS WORSHIP To: Honorable Members of the

2020 Testimony – 78 Read More »

2020 Testimony – 31

Re: OPPOSTITION to H.B. 5448 AN ACT CONCERNING A RISK PROTECTION ORDER OR WARRANT.  To: The members of the Judiciary Committee, Any procedure that allows a judge to hear only one side of a case will only produce a high rate of abuse. This is constitutional rights you’re talking about.  Keep Connecticut’s requirement that a

2020 Testimony – 31 Read More »

2020 Testimony – 47

Oppose HB5448 AN ACT CONCERNING A RISK PROTECTION ORDER OR WARRANT Support HB5390 AN ACT CONCERNING THE DUTY TO RETREAT IN A HOUSE OF RELIGIOUS WORSHIP Support HB5432 AN ACT CONCERNING NONLETHAL ELECTRONIC DEFENSE WEAPONS Honorable Members of the Judiciary Committee, In Connecticut, a confiscation petition may be filed only by two law enforcement officers

2020 Testimony – 47 Read More »

2020 Testimony – 63

Esteemed Judiciary Committee Members; Support- H.B. 5390 AAC the Duty to Retreat in a House of Religious Worship Support- H.B. 5432 AAC Nonlethal Electronic Defense Weapons OPPOSE- H.B. 5448 AAC a Risk Protection Order or Warrant H.B. 5448 AAC a Risk Protection Order or Warrant this bill would demand that anyone who has had a

2020 Testimony – 63 Read More »

2020 Testimony – 79

To the members of the Judiciary Committee H.B. 5448 AN ACT CONCERNING A RISK PROTECTION ORDER OR WARRANT. H.B. 5432 AN ACT CONCERNING NONLETHAL ELECTRONIC DEFENSE WEAPONS H.B.  5390 AN ACT CONCERNING THE DUTY TO RETREAT IN A HOUSE OF RELIGIOUS WORSHIP I am adamantly opposed to this expansion, and equally dramatic loss of rights

2020 Testimony – 79 Read More »

2020 Testimony – 23

Joint Committee on Judiciary Legislative Office Building 300 Capitol Avenue Hartford, CT 06106 RE: OPPOSTITION to HB 5448 AN ACT CONCERNING A RISK PROTECTION ORDER OR WARRANT To: Judiciary Committee, I’m opposed to H.B. 5448 An Act Concerning a Risk Protection Order or Warrant because a study of the Indiana law allowing police to seize

2020 Testimony – 23 Read More »

Scroll to Top
Malcare WordPress Security