Testimony

Members of the Judiciary Committee,  OPPOSE HB 5448 AN ACT CONCERNING A RISK PROTECTION ORDER OR WARRANT. This bill is a slippery slope to the erosion of our basic freedoms. The checks and balances of The Constitution is what makes the citizens of this country free from the government. The fourth amendment wasn’t intended to […]

Oppose- AAC a Risk Protection Order or Warrant Support- AAC the Duty to Retreat in a House of Religious Worship Support- AAC Nonlethal Electronic Defense Weapons Esteemed Judiciary Committee Members; I’m opposed to AAC a Risk Protection Order or Warrant. This bill as yet another political attack on gun owners and the Second Amendment by

OPPOSE-Raised HB-5448 An Act Concerning a Risk Protection Order or Warrant SUPPORT- Raised HB-5390 An Act Concerning the Duty to Retreat in a House of Religious Worship. SUPPORT- Raised HB-5432 An Act Concerning Nonlethal Electronic Defense Weapons. To Whom it May Concern, HB-5448 expand the list of persons who may seek a risk warrant. Currently,

Dear Judiciary Committee, I Oppose H.B. 5448, I Support H.B. No. 5390, I Support H.B. No. 5432 I urge you to oppose H.B. 5448.  This is just wrong that someone can have their civil rights stripped and be forced to get rid of their legally owned property without the due process Americans expect.  Where are

Judiciary Committee Members,                 OPPOSE HB 5448. We have current “Red Flag” laws which have been in place for over 20 years.  I urge you to strengthen the laws that are currently in place. This bill is simply a reach to strip individuals not only of their property but rights. The inability to refute allegations

Honorable Members of the Judiciary Committee, Courts have identified seven key elements in procedural due process; 1. Notice 2. A neutral decision-maker 3. An opportunity to make an oral presentation 4. The opportunity to present evidence 5. The opportunity to cross-examine witnesses and respond to evidence 6. Right to representation by counsel 7. A decision

I am Opposed to Bill #5448 AN ACT CONCERNING A RISK PROTECTION ORDER OR WARRANT I am in Support of Bill #5432 AN ACT CONCERNING NONLETHAL ELECTRONIC DEFENSE WEAPONS I am in Support of Bill #5390 AN ACT CONCERNING THE DUTY TO RETREAT IN A HOUSE OF RELIGIOUS WORSHIP Members of the Judiciary Committee, If

Judiciary Committee, Please: Oppose H.B. 5448, Support H.B. No. 5390, Support H.B. No. 5432 You must oppose H.B. 5448.  How anyone can think that taking someone’s property and stripping them of their rights should be done based on just accusations is unbelievable.  This is like 3rd World Country policing.  You must oppose HB 5448. Please

Dear Committee, I am a resident of Connecticut and wish to voice my opposition for Bill 5448. Your opposition for this bill is important to me. There are already laws on the books that can protect people instead of this bill changing the existing law into something which I see being too easy to abuse.

Joint Committee on Judiciary Legislative Office Building 300 Capitol Avenue Hartford, CT 06106 RE: OPPOSTITION to HB 5448 AN ACT CONCERNING A RISK PROTECTION ORDER OR WARRANT To: Judiciary Committee, I’m opposed to H.B. 5448 An Act Concerning a Risk Protection Order or Warrant because a study of the Indiana law allowing police to seize