Testimony

testimony before state legislature
use TAGs to differentiate years

2020 Testimony – 30

I am Opposed to Bill #5448 AN ACT CONCERNING A RISK PROTECTION ORDER OR WARRANT Sen Winfield, Rep Stafstrom, Members of the Judiciary Committee, If this committee is concerned with legal gun owners’ mental health, why pass a bill that will discourage gun owners from seeking mental health? The current law has is effective. Oppose […]

2020 Testimony – 30 Read More »

2020 Testimony – 46

OPPOSE- Raised HB-5448 An Act Concerning a Risk Protection Order or Warrant Judiciary Committee, I’m opposed to any procedure that allows a judge to hear only one side of a case, this will produce a high error rate. Civil liberties will be striped based on one sided judgment. This wrong. Oppose Raised HB-5448. SUPPORT- Raised

2020 Testimony – 46 Read More »

2020 Testimony – 62

Oppose Bill #5448 An Act Concerning a Risk Protection Order or Warrant Members of the Joint Judiciary Committee Keep the due process, allow for an investigation before rights are taken away. Any procedure that allows a judge to hear only one side of a case necessarily will produce a high error rate. Support Bill #5432

2020 Testimony – 62 Read More »

2020 Testimony – 78

Joint Committee on Judiciary 300 Capitol Avenue Hartford, CT 06106 OPPOSTITION to HB 5448 AN ACT CONCERNING A RISK PROTECTION ORDER OR WARRANT SUPPORT for HB 5432 AN ACT CONCERNING NONLETHAL ELECTRONIC DEFENSE WEAPONS SUPPORT HB 5390 AN ACT CONCERNING THE DUTY TO RETREAT IN A HOUSE OF RELIGIOUS WORSHIP To: Honorable Members of the

2020 Testimony – 78 Read More »

2020 Testimony – 31

Re: OPPOSTITION to H.B. 5448 AN ACT CONCERNING A RISK PROTECTION ORDER OR WARRANT.  To: The members of the Judiciary Committee, Any procedure that allows a judge to hear only one side of a case will only produce a high rate of abuse. This is constitutional rights you’re talking about.  Keep Connecticut’s requirement that a

2020 Testimony – 31 Read More »

2020 Testimony – 47

Oppose HB5448 AN ACT CONCERNING A RISK PROTECTION ORDER OR WARRANT Support HB5390 AN ACT CONCERNING THE DUTY TO RETREAT IN A HOUSE OF RELIGIOUS WORSHIP Support HB5432 AN ACT CONCERNING NONLETHAL ELECTRONIC DEFENSE WEAPONS Honorable Members of the Judiciary Committee, In Connecticut, a confiscation petition may be filed only by two law enforcement officers

2020 Testimony – 47 Read More »

2020 Testimony – 63

Esteemed Judiciary Committee Members; Support- H.B. 5390 AAC the Duty to Retreat in a House of Religious Worship Support- H.B. 5432 AAC Nonlethal Electronic Defense Weapons OPPOSE- H.B. 5448 AAC a Risk Protection Order or Warrant H.B. 5448 AAC a Risk Protection Order or Warrant this bill would demand that anyone who has had a

2020 Testimony – 63 Read More »

2020 Testimony – 79

To the members of the Judiciary Committee H.B. 5448 AN ACT CONCERNING A RISK PROTECTION ORDER OR WARRANT. H.B. 5432 AN ACT CONCERNING NONLETHAL ELECTRONIC DEFENSE WEAPONS H.B.  5390 AN ACT CONCERNING THE DUTY TO RETREAT IN A HOUSE OF RELIGIOUS WORSHIP I am adamantly opposed to this expansion, and equally dramatic loss of rights

2020 Testimony – 79 Read More »

2020 Testimony – 32

Judiciary Committee 300 Capitol Avenue Hartford, CT 06106 Judiciary Committee, I’m opposed to HB5448, An Act Concerning a Risk Protection Order or Warrant. There is no need to change Connecticut’s risk warrant law. Currently, the risk warrant is available to anyone at any time, day or night, weekday, weekends or holidays, with police arriving within

2020 Testimony – 32 Read More »

2020 Testimony – 48

Oppose HB5448 AN ACT CONCERNING A RISK PROTECTION ORDER OR WARRANT Support HB 5432 AN ACT CONCERNING NONLETHAL ELECTRONIC DEFENSE WEAPONS Support HB 5390 AN ACT CONCERNING THE DUTY TO RETREAT IN A HOUSE OF RELIGIOUS WORSHIP Honorable Members of the Judiciary Committee, In Connecticut, a confiscation petition may be filed only by law enforcement

2020 Testimony – 48 Read More »

Scroll to Top
Malcare WordPress Security