Testimony

Joint Judiciary Committee 300 Capitol Avenue Hartford, CT 06106 OPPOSTITION to HB 5448 AN ACT CONCERNING A RISK PROTECTION ORDER OR WARRANT SUPPORT HB 5432 AN ACT CONCERNING NONLETHAL ELECTRONIC DEFENSE WEAPONS SUPPORT HB 5390 AN ACT CONCERNING THE DUTY TO RETREAT IN A HOUSE OF RELIGIOUS WORSHIP To: Members of the Joint Judiciary Committee, […]

Oppose H.B. 5448 AN ACT CONCERNING A RISK PROTECTION ORDER OR WARRANT Support H.B. 5390 AN ACT CONCERNING THE DUTY TO RETREAT IN A HOUSE OF RELIGIOUS WORSHIP Support H.B. 5432 AN ACT CONCERNING NONLETHAL ELECTRONIC DEFENSE WEAPONS Members of the Judiciary Committee, One study looked at suicide in Connecticut. Connecticut’s estimated reduction in firearm

To the members of the Judiciary Committee Re: H.B. No. 5448 AN ACT CONCERNING A RISK PROTECTION ORDER OR WARRANT. I am adamantly opposed to this expansion, and equally dramatic loss of rights proposed by HB 5448. An actual abuser can use this to disarm their intended victim, and then following that, their intended and

Oppose HB5448 AN ACT CONCERNING A RISK PROTECTION ORDER OR WARRANT Support HB5432 AN ACT CONCERNING NONLETHAL ELECTRONIC DEFENSE WEAPONS Honorable Members of the Judiciary Committee, It is well-known in family and domestic law that ex parte procedures with low standards of evidence are often abused by angry spouses in a divorce, jilted lovers, and

Re: SUPPORT HB 5432 AN ACT CONCERNING NONLETHAL ELECTRONIC DEFENSE WEAPONS SUPPORT HB 5390 AN ACT CONCERNING THE DUTY TO RETREAT IN A HOUSE OF RELIGIOUS WORSHIP OPPOSTITION to HB 5448 AN ACT CONCERNING A RISK PROTECTION ORDER OR WARRANT Joint Committee on Judiciary, I’m opposed to HB 5448 AN ACT CONCERNING A RISK PROTECTION

I Oppose H.B. 5448: AN ACT CONCERNING A RISK PROTECTION ORDER OR WARRANT I Support H.B. No. 5390: AN ACT CONCERNING THE DUTY TO RETREAT IN A HOUSE OF RELIGIOUS WORSHIP I Support H.B. No. 5432 AN ACT CONCERNING NONLETHAL ELECTRONIC DEFENSE WEAPONS Dear Senator Winfield, Representative Stafstrom, Distinguished Members of the Judiciary Committee, I

To Whom it May Concern,                 I am writing this letter with concern for the future of our inalienable rights. HB No. 5448 AN ACT CONCERNING A RISK PROTECTION ORDER OR WARRANT is a direct attack on our SECOND and FOURTH AMENDMENT RIGHTS. Removing personal property based upon often times emotional, one sided hearsay is

OPPOSE Bill #5448 An Act Concerning a Risk Protection Order or Warrant To Whom it May Concern, The Giffords/Bloomberg system, allows petitions to be filed by a very wide variety of people, including ex-girlfriends or ex-boyfriends. Keep Connecticut’s requirement that a petition must be filed by two law enforcement officers, and they must have conducted

Judiciary Committee Room 2500 300 Capitol Avenue Hartford, CT 06106 OPPOSE: AN ACT CONCERNING A RISK PROTECTION ORDER OR WARRANT. SUPPORT: AN ACT CONCERNING NONLETHAL ELECTRONIC DEFENSE WEAPONS SUPPORT: AN ACT CONCERNING THE DUTY TO RETREAT IN A HOUSE OF RELIGIOUS WORSHIP Esteemed Judiciary Committee Members, I am opposed to HB5448 AN ACT CONCERNING A

Dear Senator Winfield, Representative Stafstrom, Distinguished Members of the Judiciary Committee, I Oppose H.B. 5448: AN ACT CONCERNING A RISK PROTECTION ORDER OR WARRANT I Support H.B. No. 5390: AN ACT CONCERNING THE DUTY TO RETREAT IN A HOUSE OF RELIGIOUS WORSHIP I Support H.B. No. 5432 AN ACT CONCERNING NONLETHAL ELECTRONIC DEFENSE WEAPONS H.B.