Testimony

Senator Winfield, Representative Stafstrom, and distinguished Committee members: My name is [your name], I am from [town you reside] and I’m a law-abiding citizen. I’m in favor of H.B. 5227 An Act Concerning Regulation of Firearms by Municipalities, preventing confusion as I travel about my home State. As a law-abiding citizen, I don’t want to […]

Oppose; S.B. 60, H.B. 7219, H.B. 7223 Support; S.B. 940, H.B. 5227, H.B. 5870 Judiciary Committee Members, Imagine, if you would, a State where each and every Town or City had its own currency.  A Hartford Dollars would be good in Bridgeport, but not in Westport. A Bethel Buck would be banned in Hartford. Makes

Support AN ACT AUTHORIZING CERTAIN PERSONS TO CARRY HANDGUNS IN STATE PARKS AND FORESTS. Oppose AN ACT CONCERNING GHOST GUNS Members of the Judiciary Committee, The unique factor with state parks is that they are generally spread out over large geographic areas, and typically have little to no armed law enforcement presence. Personal attacks on

Sen. Winfield, Rep. Stafstrom, and Members of the Judiciary Committee: My name is [YOUR NAME], I am from [YOUR TOWN], I’m asking that you not support any further restrictions on the law-abiding citizens. Connecticut gun owners are once again the target of more restrictions. Please vote: NO on S.B. No. 60 AN ACT CONCERNING THE

Vote favorable on; S.B. No. 940, H.B. No. 5227, H.B. No. 5870 Vote unfavorable on; S.B. No. 60, H.B. No. 7219, H.B. No. 7223 Offer substitute language H.B. No. 7218 Distinguished Members of the Judiciary Committee, I’m a resident of Connecticut, I’m opposed to more restriction on law-abiding citizens. Enforce the current laws and stop

Senator Winfield, Representative Stafstrom, and Distinguished Members of the Judiciary Committee: Oppose An Act Concerning Ghost Guns.  Please don’t fall victim to clever terms. Firearms didn’t require serial numbers until after 1968. The proponents of this bill will say criminals are making “assault” or “military” weapons at home. This is already against Connecticut law.  Oppose

OPPOSE R.B. 6355 AN ACT CONCERNING RISK PROTECTION ORDERS OR WARRANTS. To: Judiciary Committee Members; Any bill that will allow a judge to hear only one side of a case will only produce a high rate of abuse. Do not take away constitutional rights based on one sided case.  Keep the requirement two officers must

Honorable Members of the Judiciary Committee, Please OPPOSE Raised Bill 6355 Courts have identified seven key elements in procedural due process; 1. Notice 2. A neutral decision-maker 3. An opportunity to make an oral presentation 4. The opportunity to present evidence 5. The opportunity to cross-examine witnesses and respond to evidence 6. Right to representation

Dear Committee, I am a resident of Connecticut and wish to voice my opposition for Bill 6355. Your opposition for this bill is important to me. There are already laws on the books that can protect people instead of this bill changing the existing law into something which I see being too easy to abuse.

Members of The Judiciary Committee, I am writing regarding H.B. 6355 An Act Concerning Risk Protection Orders or Warrants. This bill is nothing more than a mask over a gun grabbing agenda. There are current laws written making offenses with firearms illegal, as well as domestic violence offenses. Please make harsher penalties for offenders of