Administrator

2020 Testimony – 38

To Whom it May Concern,                 I am writing this letter with concern for the future of our inalienable rights. HB No. 5448 AN ACT CONCERNING A RISK PROTECTION ORDER OR WARRANT is a direct attack on our SECOND and FOURTH AMENDMENT RIGHTS. Removing personal property based upon often times emotional, one sided hearsay is […]

2020 Testimony – 38 Read More »

2020 Testimony – 45

Re: H.B. 5448 AN ACT CONCERNING A RISK PROTECTION ORDER OR WARRANT. Re: H.B. 5390 AN ACT CONCERNING THE DUTY TO RETREAT IN A HOUSE OF RELIGIOUS WORSHIP Re: H.B. 5432 AN ACT CONCERNING NONLETHAL ELECTRONIC DEFENSE WEAPONS Sen Winfield, Rep Stafstrom, Members of the Committee, I’m writing today because I’m strongly opposed to H.B.

2020 Testimony – 45 Read More »

2020 Testimony – 44

Members of the Joint Judiciary Committee If we are looking to make a change to the law, it should be that anyone who uses it as a “revenge tool” gets charged. The situation becomes even more precarious when loved ones can petition for the removal of firearms. Spurned former partners or family members seeking revenge

2020 Testimony – 44 Read More »

2020 Testimony – 37

To the members of the Judiciary Committee Re: H.B. No. 5448 AN ACT CONCERNING A RISK PROTECTION ORDER OR WARRANT. I am adamantly opposed to this expansion, and equally dramatic loss of rights proposed by HB 5448. An actual abuser can use this to disarm their intended victim, and then following that, their intended and

2020 Testimony – 37 Read More »

2020 Testimony – 43

Support- HOUSE BILL 5432 AN ACT CONCERNING NONLETHAL ELECTRONIC DEFENSE WEAPONS Support- HOUSE BILL 5390 AN ACT CONCERNING THE DUTY TO RETREAT IN A HOUSE OF RELIGIOUS WORSHIP Oppose- HOUSE BILL 5448 AAC A RISK PROTECTION ORDER OR WARRANT To Whom it May Concern, The current risk warrant laws have met the needs of Connecticut

2020 Testimony – 43 Read More »

2020 Testimony – 42

OPPOSE: Raised HB-5448 AN ACT CONCERNING A RISK PROTECTION ORDER OR WARRANT Support: Raised HB-5432 AN ACT CONCERNING NONLETHAL ELECTRONIC DEFENSE WEAPONS Support: Raised HB-5390 AN ACT CONCERNING THE DUTY TO RETREAT IN A HOUSE OF RELIGIOUS WORSHIP Esteemed Judiciary Committee Members, I’m opposed to HB- 5448, keep the due process, allow for an investigation

2020 Testimony – 42 Read More »

2020 Testimony – 71

OPPOSE-Raised HB-5448 An Act Concerning a Risk Protection Order or Warrant SUPPORT- Raised HB-5390 An Act Concerning the Duty to Retreat in a House of Religious Worship. SUPPORT- Raised HB-5432 An Act Concerning Nonlethal Electronic Defense Weapons. To Whom it May Concern, HB-5448 expand the list of persons who may seek a risk warrant. Currently,

2020 Testimony – 71 Read More »

2020 Testimony – 41

Members of The Judiciary Committee,                 I am writing in regards to HB 5448 An Act Concerning a Risk Protection Order or Warrant. This bill is nothing more than a mask over a gun grabbing agenda. There are current laws written making offenses with firearms illegal, as well as domestic violence offenses. Please make harsher

2020 Testimony – 41 Read More »

2020 Testimony – 49

Re:         H.B. 5448 An Act Concerning a Risk Protection Order or Warrant                 H.B. 5390 AN ACT CONCERNING THE DUTY TO RETREAT IN A HOUSE OF RELIGIOUS WORSHIP                 H.B. 5432 AN ACT CONCERNING NONLETHAL ELECTRONIC DEFENSE WEAPONS                 Esteemed Judiciary Committee Members; I’m opposed to H.B. 5448 An Act Concerning a Risk Protection

2020 Testimony – 49 Read More »

2020 Testimony – 25

Joint Committee on Judiciary Legislative Office Building 300 Capitol Avenue Hartford, CT 06106 RE: OPPOSTITION to HB 5448 AN ACT CONCERNING A RISK PROTECTION ORDER OR WARRANT Dear Committee, I am a resident of Connecticut and wish to voice my OPPOSTITION to HB 5448 AN ACT CONCERNING A RISK PROTECTION ORDER OR WARRANT. Rather than

2020 Testimony – 25 Read More »

Scroll to Top
Malcare WordPress Security