Administrator

To Whom it May Concern,                 I am writing this letter with concern for the future of our inalienable rights. HB No. 5448 AN ACT CONCERNING A RISK PROTECTION ORDER OR WARRANT is a direct attack on our SECOND and FOURTH AMENDMENT RIGHTS. Removing personal property based upon often times emotional, one sided hearsay is […]

Members of the Judiciary Committee,  OPPOSE HB 5448 AN ACT CONCERNING A RISK PROTECTION ORDER OR WARRANT. This bill is a slippery slope to the erosion of our basic freedoms. The checks and balances of The Constitution is what makes the citizens of this country free from the government. The fourth amendment wasn’t intended to

Judiciary Committee Members,                 OPPOSE HB 5448. We have current “Red Flag” laws which have been in place for over 20 years.  I urge you to strengthen the laws that are currently in place. This bill is simply a reach to strip individuals not only of their property but rights. The inability to refute allegations

Members of The Judiciary Committee,                 I am writing in regards to HB 5448 An Act Concerning a Risk Protection Order or Warrant. This bill is nothing more than a mask over a gun grabbing agenda. There are current laws written making offenses with firearms illegal, as well as domestic violence offenses. Please make harsher

OPPOSE: Raised HB-5448 AN ACT CONCERNING A RISK PROTECTION ORDER OR WARRANT Support: Raised HB-5432 AN ACT CONCERNING NONLETHAL ELECTRONIC DEFENSE WEAPONS Support: Raised HB-5390 AN ACT CONCERNING THE DUTY TO RETREAT IN A HOUSE OF RELIGIOUS WORSHIP Esteemed Judiciary Committee Members, I’m opposed to HB- 5448, keep the due process, allow for an investigation

Support- HOUSE BILL 5432 AN ACT CONCERNING NONLETHAL ELECTRONIC DEFENSE WEAPONS Support- HOUSE BILL 5390 AN ACT CONCERNING THE DUTY TO RETREAT IN A HOUSE OF RELIGIOUS WORSHIP Oppose- HOUSE BILL 5448 AAC A RISK PROTECTION ORDER OR WARRANT To Whom it May Concern, The current risk warrant laws have met the needs of Connecticut

Members of the Joint Judiciary Committee If we are looking to make a change to the law, it should be that anyone who uses it as a “revenge tool” gets charged. The situation becomes even more precarious when loved ones can petition for the removal of firearms. Spurned former partners or family members seeking revenge

Re: H.B. 5448 AN ACT CONCERNING A RISK PROTECTION ORDER OR WARRANT. Re: H.B. 5390 AN ACT CONCERNING THE DUTY TO RETREAT IN A HOUSE OF RELIGIOUS WORSHIP Re: H.B. 5432 AN ACT CONCERNING NONLETHAL ELECTRONIC DEFENSE WEAPONS Sen Winfield, Rep Stafstrom, Members of the Committee, I’m writing today because I’m strongly opposed to H.B.

Oppose HB5448 AN ACT CONCERNING A RISK PROTECTION ORDER OR WARRANT Support HB5390 AN ACT CONCERNING THE DUTY TO RETREAT IN A HOUSE OF RELIGIOUS WORSHIP Support HB5432 AN ACT CONCERNING NONLETHAL ELECTRONIC DEFENSE WEAPONS Honorable Members of the Judiciary Committee, In Connecticut, a confiscation petition may be filed only by two law enforcement officers

I am Opposed to Bill #5448 AN ACT CONCERNING A RISK PROTECTION ORDER OR WARRANT Sen Winfield, Rep Stafstrom, Members of the Judiciary Committee, If this committee is concerned with legal gun owners’ mental health, why pass a bill that will discourage gun owners from seeking mental health? The current law has is effective. Oppose